In the stochastic differential equation dXt=μt dt+σt dWtdX_t = \mu_t\,dt + \sigma_t\,dW_t, the coefficient μt\mu_t of the μt dt\mu_t\,dt term is the drift. If the drift is a constant μ\mu and σ\sigma is also constant, then Xt=μt+σWtX_t = \mu t + \sigma W_t, which the MIT notes call Brownian motion with drift μ\mu. Its expected value is E[Xt]=μtE[X_t] = \mu t; the WtW_t term does not affect the mean12.

For example, with μ=2\mu = 2 (per year) and X0=100X_0 = 100, the expected value after 3 years is 100+2×3=106100 + 2 \times 3 = 106. The actual value will be above or below this by the movement of WtW_t.

The drift need not be constant and can depend on the current value. In the Hull-White model, the drift of the short rate is θ(t)−art\theta(t) - a r_t, which expresses mean reversion pulling the rate toward the level θ(t)/a\theta(t)/a3. The drift of the same process also changes when the probability measure is changed. In the LIBOR market model, under the forward measure that takes the bond maturing at TM+1T_{M+1} as the reference, the drift of the last forward rate is 0, while the drifts of the other forward rates are not 04.

Notes

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "Lecture 18: Itō Calculus", Example 1.3 (i) (page 2) and Section 3, "Change of measure" (pages 5 to 7). The text replaces the source's BtB_t with WtW_t. ↩

  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "Lecture 17: Stochastic Processes II", Example 2.6 (page 5; the expected value of Brownian motion with drift μ\mu is E[X(t)]=μtE[X(t)] = \mu t). The example is calculated from this formula. ↩

  3. "Interest Rate Modelling and Derivative Pricing" (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Sebastian Schlenkrich, winter semester 2020/21), Part IV, slide p. 254 (the Hull-White equation dr=(θ(t)−ar) dt+σ dWdr = (\theta(t) - a r)\,dt + \sigma\,dW). That θ(t)/a\theta(t)/a is the level follows from the equation. ↩

  4. Martin Haugh, "Market Models" (Columbia University, Term Structure Models: IEOR E4710, 2010), page 6, equation (14), and page 8, equations (24) and (25) and Remark 3. ↩