If a zero-coupon bond is chosen as the numeraire, the price of a caplet with period δ\delta can be written as the bond price times the expected payoff. The price at time tt is δ ZtT+δ EtT+δ[(L(T,T)−K)+]\delta\,Z_t^{T+\delta}\,E^{T+\delta}_t[(L(T,T) - K)^+], where ZtT+δZ_t^{T+\delta} is the price of the bond maturing at T+δT+\delta and ET+δE^{T+\delta} is the expected value under its forward measure. Written with another numeraire (the source's BtB_t) and a measure QQ, the same price is BtB_t times the expected value of the payoff divided by BT+δB_{T+\delta}1.

Consider a hypothetical example of a caplet with δ=0.5\delta = 0.5. Let the price of the bond maturing at T+δT+\delta be 0.98, and let the expected payoff under the forward measure, ET+δ[(L−K)+]E^{T+\delta}[(L - K)^+], be 0.4%. The price of a caplet with a notional of 1 is 0.5×0.98×0.004=0.001960.5 \times 0.98 \times 0.004 = 0.00196, and with a notional of 10 billion yen it is 0.0196 billion yen (19.6 million yen).

Changing the measure also changes how the forward rates move. Under the forward measure of the last date TM+1T_{M+1}, the last forward rate LML_M is a martingale and its drift is 0. The other forward rates are not martingales and keep a drift2. Another measure is the swap measure, used for swaptions3.

Notes

  1. Martin Haugh, "Market Models" (Columbia University, Term Structure Models: IEOR E4710, 2010), page 2, "Black's Formula for Caplets". The text writes ET+δE^{T+\delta} for the source's PT+δP^{T+\delta}. ↩

  2. Haugh, "Market Models", page 8, around equation (23) (the bond price divided by ZtM+1Z^{M+1}_t is a PM+1P^{M+1}-martingale), equations (24) and (25), and Remark 3. ↩

  3. Haugh, "Market Models", page 6, "Numeraire-EMM Pairs". The spot measure (account Bt∗B^*_t as the reference), the forward measure PTP^T (the bond maturing at TT as the reference), and the swap measure (used for analytical pricing of swaptions). ↩